Obama on Keystone XL | Harlequin Thoughts on sustainability
Up to Obama's climate speech on Tuesday was given the impression that he would in no way get into one of the most central sprøgsmål in the past year U.S. climate debate whether the United States should allow construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which could bring more than 800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Alberta to Texas, where it will be refined and shipped out to the global market. But in Georgetown, he spoke actually a half minutes of it, and did so to speak, to repolarize debate.
There have in the past almost two years been much talk about the Keystone XL compared to the number of jobs, environmental degradation, energy security and the insane in at once to totalrasre a wooded landscape the size of France and to contribute to making the world's dirtiest oil available on the world market. But Obama did with his speech stated that it is crucial for his approval of the Keystone XL was whether the pipeline increased chikki machine climate impact significantly.
Now, I know there's been, for example, a lot of controversy surrounding forslaget two build a pipeline, the Keystone pipeline, att would carry oil from Canadian tar sands down to refineries in the Gulf. And the State Department is going through the final stages of evaluating of forslaget. That's how it's always been done. But I do want to be clear: Allowing the Keystone chikki machine Pipeline two byggas kræver a finding att doing so would be in our nation's interest. And our national interest will be served only if this project does not betydligt exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The net effects of the pipeline's impact on our climate will be absolutely critical two Determining om this project is allowed to go forward. It's appropriate.
I heard it just as if he thus said that Keystone XL will never be anything - from a prior assumption that Keystone XL is deeply problematic for global climate action, since it allows enormous deposits of the dirtiest (and CO 2-containing) form of oil being released chikki machine into the world market. However, chikki machine a number of commentators have heard it pæcist opposite Obama on that basis would be able to approve Keystone XL. There is also currently an environmental statement, which has been criticized to pieces because it does not address problemrnes core. It concludes that climate change impacts chikki machine will be increased chikki machine by the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline - but it was subsequently found that it was written by a group of people closely associated with Canadian chikki machine oil interests and is now regarded as worthless.
It says something about Obama's oratory that he can get both supporters and opponents to feel confirmed in what he says. But it is probably important to realize that he has not yet decided, and that he will not rush into the decision. Judging by Obama's speech, he sees clearly that it is not just a question of jobs and short-term chikki machine profits, but to be able to get hold of the overall global climate efforts, and I am now more confident that he sees Keystone XLs more fundamental problem: konfliken between the short-term economic (Canadian) prize and the unaffordable price of the destitution of the world for generations to come.
In Alberta's tar sands deposits tied more CO2 than mankind together to deduce from the beginning of industrialization until today. Keystone XL issues are not just a pipeline, but it, which in recent years has become increasingly clear that we not only need to look at how we can save on oil, but also have to look at where much of the stocks of oil and coal, we now know is in the ground which has to be lying, that we are still able to keep the international community's decision from Copenhagen that global warming must be kept below 2 C. IEA and UNEP has in recent years meant that more than two-thirds of all known fossil reserves must remain unused if we are to have a chance to keep the 2 C objective. And once you into thinking that perspective, chikki machine it becomes evident to allow coal and tar sand deposits remain and in turn use the 'cleaner' oil and gas deposits in the transition to the post fossil society.
With the understanding of the climate problem, as Obama puts for the day, I have confidence that he did not just buy the Canadians spin that the pipeline is not going to lead to further emissions as the oil is burned in any case. Here it would seem appropriate to Connie Hedegaard and the EU in the field and clarify that tar sand oil with its high CO 2 content is a filthy oil, as if it were up to her, never come within EU borders.
While Obama probably has not yet decided on Keystone XL so it seems logic that he says we
Up to Obama's climate speech on Tuesday was given the impression that he would in no way get into one of the most central sprøgsmål in the past year U.S. climate debate whether the United States should allow construction of the Keystone XL oil pipeline, which could bring more than 800,000 barrels of tar sands oil per day from Alberta to Texas, where it will be refined and shipped out to the global market. But in Georgetown, he spoke actually a half minutes of it, and did so to speak, to repolarize debate.
There have in the past almost two years been much talk about the Keystone XL compared to the number of jobs, environmental degradation, energy security and the insane in at once to totalrasre a wooded landscape the size of France and to contribute to making the world's dirtiest oil available on the world market. But Obama did with his speech stated that it is crucial for his approval of the Keystone XL was whether the pipeline increased chikki machine climate impact significantly.
Now, I know there's been, for example, a lot of controversy surrounding forslaget two build a pipeline, the Keystone pipeline, att would carry oil from Canadian tar sands down to refineries in the Gulf. And the State Department is going through the final stages of evaluating of forslaget. That's how it's always been done. But I do want to be clear: Allowing the Keystone chikki machine Pipeline two byggas kræver a finding att doing so would be in our nation's interest. And our national interest will be served only if this project does not betydligt exacerbate the problem of carbon pollution. The net effects of the pipeline's impact on our climate will be absolutely critical two Determining om this project is allowed to go forward. It's appropriate.
I heard it just as if he thus said that Keystone XL will never be anything - from a prior assumption that Keystone XL is deeply problematic for global climate action, since it allows enormous deposits of the dirtiest (and CO 2-containing) form of oil being released chikki machine into the world market. However, chikki machine a number of commentators have heard it pæcist opposite Obama on that basis would be able to approve Keystone XL. There is also currently an environmental statement, which has been criticized to pieces because it does not address problemrnes core. It concludes that climate change impacts chikki machine will be increased chikki machine by the construction of the Keystone XL pipeline - but it was subsequently found that it was written by a group of people closely associated with Canadian chikki machine oil interests and is now regarded as worthless.
It says something about Obama's oratory that he can get both supporters and opponents to feel confirmed in what he says. But it is probably important to realize that he has not yet decided, and that he will not rush into the decision. Judging by Obama's speech, he sees clearly that it is not just a question of jobs and short-term chikki machine profits, but to be able to get hold of the overall global climate efforts, and I am now more confident that he sees Keystone XLs more fundamental problem: konfliken between the short-term economic (Canadian) prize and the unaffordable price of the destitution of the world for generations to come.
In Alberta's tar sands deposits tied more CO2 than mankind together to deduce from the beginning of industrialization until today. Keystone XL issues are not just a pipeline, but it, which in recent years has become increasingly clear that we not only need to look at how we can save on oil, but also have to look at where much of the stocks of oil and coal, we now know is in the ground which has to be lying, that we are still able to keep the international community's decision from Copenhagen that global warming must be kept below 2 C. IEA and UNEP has in recent years meant that more than two-thirds of all known fossil reserves must remain unused if we are to have a chance to keep the 2 C objective. And once you into thinking that perspective, chikki machine it becomes evident to allow coal and tar sand deposits remain and in turn use the 'cleaner' oil and gas deposits in the transition to the post fossil society.
With the understanding of the climate problem, as Obama puts for the day, I have confidence that he did not just buy the Canadians spin that the pipeline is not going to lead to further emissions as the oil is burned in any case. Here it would seem appropriate to Connie Hedegaard and the EU in the field and clarify that tar sand oil with its high CO 2 content is a filthy oil, as if it were up to her, never come within EU borders.
While Obama probably has not yet decided on Keystone XL so it seems logic that he says we
No comments:
Post a Comment