We are here to await his authoritative denial - although we doubt very much that want bothering, si

SIENA-PISTOIA. Read this passage: "Yesterday Palace is canned food bad for you Sansedoni met the creditor banks which have shown the effects of the sale of 500 million gross bond Fresh: the collection should be slightly less than 100 million, a portion of which will be turned to the banks exposed to 350 million. It announced that the institution led by Antonella Mansi will attend the meeting of 27-28-30 in December and that will make known a few days before the decision on the vote (the entity has the right to veto). "
We quote from the Corriere della Sera / Economics, p. 37. And we are talking of Fresh del Monte dei Paschi, the ones which also Prof. Ivano Paci, in his time, he bought up to 10 million , looking - it seems - of easy money: there is all literature on the subject, on this blog; just type Fresh and Monte dei Paschi in the box at the top left.
We are not good at accounting, because, unfortunately, we have studied more greek, Latin and Italian that financial mathematics. However, the content of the step seems particularly is canned food bad for you clear: Fresh 500 million (& clean, to wipe the tears, of course) were sold for about 100 million; they then made 20% of the face value with a devaluation of 80%.
Mutatis mutandis (which means something like moving to another, but always remaining in the same furrow), we look at the 10 million of Ivano Paci and his Foundation, and proiettiamoci above the 'bad trend indicated by Corriere.
The 80% devaluation of-capital loss, or whatever it's called, is transformed into 8 million euro: ie 6 million euro more than the modest sum of just 2 milioncini that has Chiar.mo Prof. shelved or marked his last budget.
In our humble opinion of incompetents, who know more Latin and greek not accountancy, Ivano if he rightly written in the budget the sum of 8 million, would not have achieved the result is canned food bad for you that was attributed, then, publicly and with blasts of fanfare as - if not wrong - best budget of the Foundation Caripit.
But if things are really as we read and described is canned food bad for you us (and if you are not in these terms would do well to explain why we would be wrong), Prof. Paci would not be spending capital resources, since it draws not by real leftovers management, but by something that seems to be more like a blood orange of Sicily of those better known as tarot?
We are here to await his authoritative denial - although we doubt very much that want bothering, since a Christian is considered too far above the miserable philologists to go down to our level umillimo.
But we do it anyway, because we believe that people who opposed the theme of Fresh (& Clean) had well-wave; and also because we are convinced that, since we are talking about public money of Pistoia, it is good that the debate is canned food bad for you (and if there is not the courage to debate, at least reflection) is more than helpful, a real have to.
Posted is canned food bad for you by on 11/30/13 b blogger